5. Learned Deputy Prosecutor General and counsel for that complainant further argued that during the investigation of your case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led on the recovery of sleeping capsules on fourteen.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore is manufactured before the Court wherein the sleeping capsules were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected from the liver although not within the tummy. That's why, the recovery of reported sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Acquired Deputy Prosecutor General and counsel for the complainant have also argued that during the investigation in the case the petitioner Bhoora led for the recovery of a motorcycle.
However, In case the same person were charged with section 300 and 302, their defence that they never meant to kill the person – and that they just needed to injure them or incapacitate them –, will fall short, as the elements on the offence only involve the intent to cause injury to get proven, not the intention to cause death.
V) During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that fireplace-arm injury which was fatal to the deceased was caused via the petitioner but in support of opinion of your Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is obtainable about the file and mere ipsi dixit of police is not really binding on the Court.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not reply to inquiries seeking legal assistance or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed for the court in which the case is or will be filed.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
The different roles of case regulation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in just how that courts render decisions. Common legislation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale driving their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and sometimes interpret the wider legal principles.
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment with the grid project and submitted that ample mitigation measures were in place to render any probable adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted to become created.
The Court regarded the case for being maintainable under Article 184 (3) since the danger and encroachment alleged were for instance to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, which include eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature of the seized currency.
acquitted the appellants from the many charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )
Finally, a significant contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration from the Court under Article 184 (three), has been setting a precedent which allows for much less difficult access to your public to approach the superior courts along with the subordinate courts on environment related issues.
Post arrest bail Granted, U/S 302 PPC, charge of conspiracy and ent couldn't be proved Unless of course case is experimented with(Bail Matters)
13309-B of 2010 to generally be weak types of evidence as well as evidentiary value whereof would be viewed within the time of the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, So, confirmed custody of the petitioner in jail is not going to provide any valuable purpose at this stage.”
a hundred and fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance with the respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account of your allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 of your Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. These click here involve if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set because of the government.